Underestimated Climate Risks: An interview with Roger Baumann and Immobilien Business
Risk ManagementArticleJanuary 8, 2026
Immobilien Business: Mr. Baumann, certified meteorologist and TV presenter Sven Plöger has written a book about the effects of climate change entitled "Zieht Euch warm an, es wird heiss" (Wrap up warm, it's going to get hot). Do real estate investors also need to "wrap up warm"?
Roger Baumann: The expression "dress warmly" means preparing for a difficult situation. In this sense, the answer is a clear yes. Global warming is leading to a significant increase in risks from extreme events such as heavy rain, river flooding, and storms for properties in exposed locations. Climate change is not a future scenario, but a real risk factor, and is already leading to rising operating costs and changing location conditions.
The Climate Resilience Team at Zurich Resilience Solutions has developed an assessment methodology to determine the potential climate risks for each individual property and thus also for entire portfolios. Why? There is already a flood of data showing where and how often extreme weather events occur.
That's exactly the point. We know where extreme weather events have occurred in the past. But that's just looking in the rearview mirror. What we need is an assessment methodology across the entire portfolio that is based on proprietary data and sound expertise and shows where these risks will occur in the future, what extent of damage we can expect, and how we should adapt and invest accordingly. We achieve this, among other things, through a digital platform that enables clear communication between the various stakeholders, thus facilitating the implementation of the necessary adaptation measures.
Is this not possible with the existing calculation models?
The tools that exist to date are based solely on historical data on weather events and the resulting changes in value on the real estate markets. So we know which locations with a high frequency of extreme weather events have experienced property value losses. However, the tools used to date do not show the medium to long-term impact of climate change – in other words, the systematic, longer-term developments beyond individual weather events...
Without risk analysis, property owners cannot know how high the risk potential is for each of their individual properties, let alone for their entire portfolio.
For example, that properties are more difficult or even impossible to rent out, or that operating costs are rising due to higher insurance policies?
That's right. However, a number of additional factors play a role in assessing attractiveness in terms of rentability. But it will increasingly be possible to reflect this in valuation models. Regarding the question of increased operating costs:
With the aforementioned damage estimates at portfolio level, we will certainly be able to better assess future insurability and finance-ability, as well as the risk of stranded assets. In particular, we want to determine what impact natural hazards triggered by climate change could have on the performance of real estate in the future – including in locations where extreme weather events will only occur in the future. Only then will it be possible to provide recommendations for action for entire real estate portfolios – and their individual properties – in order to prevent losses in value.
How will your new risk analysis tool achieve this?
Climate Spotlight is based on specially developed data and combines global climate models with local hazard maps. This enables us to perform detailed location-specific analyses based on four different climate scenarios from the IPCC – the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the UN's world climate council – for periods up to the year 2100, and of course for shorter periods as well.
Does this enable you to obtain estimates of the probability of occurrence?
Yes, but it doesn't stop there: only by incorporating property-specific data describing exposure and existing protective measures is it possible to obtain a complete picture of the risk and quantify damage for both individual locations and at the portfolio level. For the optimal allocation of our resources, it is also essential to be able to prioritize the necessary adaptation measures in a risk-oriented manner according to asset exposure and to understand the financial added value, the return on investment. Where necessary, we carry out additional on-site inspections by our climate experts.

Roger Baumann has been Chief Operating Officer and Head of Product Development Global Real Estate at Zurich Insurance Group Investment Management since 2019.
Prior to that, he was Chief Operating Officer and Head of Sustainability at Credit Suisse Real Estate Asset Management.
He studied civil engineering at ETH Zurich, holds a dual degree MBA, and is a Member of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (MRICS).
It is now widely known that there will be more heavy rainfall events in the future because warmer air masses store more moisture and therefore produce higher amounts of rainfall. So why should property owners have their properties inspected in detail for risks? Isn't it enough to simply invest more in flood protection—for example, by raising building entrances and waterproofing basements?
These comparatively inexpensive adaptation measures will not be sufficient for all properties at risk from heavy rainfall and flooding. In highly threatened locations, flood barriers and backflow valves will probably also have to be used. However, without a detailed risk analysis, property owners cannot know how high the risk potential is for each of their properties, let alone for their entire portfolio. To make matters worse, the risks accumulate in numerous locations. In many places, real estate is exposed to a multitude of threats.
For example, because in mountainous regions, towns are not only increasingly threatened by mudslides due to more frequent heavy rainfall, but also by rockfalls triggered by the thawing of permafrost?
The events in Blatten have clearly demonstrated how these factors can interact. Residents reported that a large boulder had broken off and rolled almost to the bottom of the valley. Fortunately, the first residents were evacuated from the municipality of Blatten on May 17. In the days leading up to this, ground movements had been detected in the glacier region. Eleven days later, the devastating rockslide occurred. Climate change is creating further threatening combinations. On the one hand, there are more and more heavy rainfall events, but at the same time, heat waves are becoming more intense. The latter cause the soil to dry out and become hard as concrete. If heavy rain then follows, the water cannot seep into the ground. The result is significantly more severe flooding, which puts many more buildings at risk than in the past.
The analysis by the Climate Resilience Team shows that strong wind events will be the most significant risk factor in the future ...
Global warming is causing storms to occur more frequently and with significantly greater destructive potential. This applies not only to tropical cyclones such as hurricanes and typhoons, but also to hurricanes and tornadoes that originate outside the tropics. The damage they cause is immense. Hurricane Katrina caused insurance losses of USD 62.2 billion in the US.
In addition, winds exacerbate the consequences of other damaging events...
We are seeing this more and more often. Storms can cause tidal waves and drive forest fires forward at high speeds. The latter was impressively observed in Southern California this spring. First, an eight-month period without any precipitation over the winter had dried out the soil and vegetation. When the first fires broke out, strong winds drove the flames forward at breakneck speed, destroying entire villages.
More than 30 people died and 18,189 buildings were destroyed. JPMorgan recently estimated the insurance damage at "more than USD 20 billion." Is real estate in the vulnerable regions of Southern California still insurable against forest fires?
Wildfires pose a major challenge for the insurability of real estate in Southern California. In particularly vulnerable regions, it is currently difficult for many insurers to offer adequate insurance coverage because the risks and damages have increased significantly. The basic principle of insurance is based on a balanced distribution of risk within a community. However, if the risk becomes too high for all members, this can jeopardize the viability of the system.
In other countries, too, real estate is no longer insurable against certain risks. In Greece, for example, this applies to fire in fire-prone regions, and in Germany to flood damage in areas where heavy rainfall is common. Could this also be conceivable for Switzerland, for example in mountainous regions?
The discussion on this topic will likely take place when debris flows and landslides become more frequent and the damage they cause continues to increase. In general, the higher the probability of a damaging event, the more difficult it will be for owners to obtain insurance policies for affected properties. This underscores the need to proactively invest in adaptation measures.
Places can be protected against extreme events. Avalanche barriers have been used successfully for more than 100 years ...
Correct. However, such costly adaptation measures are only possible in cooperation with the public sector. In future, the federal government, cantons, and municipalities will probably have to contribute more financially to the prevention of natural hazards. This is because climate change is increasing the likelihood of such hazards occurring. Furthermore, the example of avalanche barriers cannot be applied to all extreme events in general. Avalanches follow predictable paths due to the slope gradient. It is possible to determine exactly which houses or districts are at risk and where protective structures need to be built.
Does this not apply to other extreme events? Floods usually affect not only individual properties or neighborhoods, but entire areas, including infrastructure such as roads and power supplies. This is why very extensive adaptation measures are necessary in this case. Public-private partnerships are therefore likely to become increasingly important in order to manage the costs incurred in the long term. In Japan, new buildings have been constructed for decades in such a way that they can withstand even the strongest earthquakes. Can't new buildings also be designed to be immune to extreme weather events?
Of course, this is possible and is already common practice in high-risk regions. In flood-prone areas, for example, new buildings are equipped with robust ground floors and special protection systems. Some existing properties can also be modernized to provide better protection against threats. However, this is currently only happening by looking in the rearview mirror. New buildings are being constructed and existing properties are being upgraded in areas where extreme events have occurred in the past, highlighting the threat.
In the medium term, there is a risk that properties with high climate risk will become unattractive to investors and more difficult to sell.
You mentioned the new risk analysis tool that you intend to use to look into the future and identify where climate risks are likely to accumulate in the future...
Due to climate change, wind, flood, and fire hazards will also occur in regions that have previously been spared these threats. And in many locations that are already affected, the risks will continue to increase.
But not all investors and portfolio holders are aware of these dangers?
This will change with the increase in climate risks. In the medium term—over three to five years—there is a risk that properties with high climate risk will become unattractive to investors and more difficult to sell. At present, the risks are still underestimated by some market players, meaning that buyers can still be found for vulnerable properties. However, this is likely to change as awareness increases and regulations become stricter. The EU taxonomy and the CSRD, the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, require climate risks to be disclosed. Building labels such as LEED also recognize the importance of climate risks more strongly and offer more incentives to create properties that are immune to them.
Zurich's total portfolio comprises more than 700 properties in Switzerland and 20 other countries in Europe, Asia, and North America, with a total value of more than CHF 20 billion. Have you used the new analysis tool to examine this portfolio and all its properties for potential climate risks?
Yes, the first phase involves identifying and prioritizing all locations, including quantifying potential financial losses. This is followed by targeted and detailed location assessments and proposals for specific adaptation measures.
The higher the probability of a damaging event, the more difficult it becomes for owners to obtain affordable policies for the properties affected.
I assume you don't want to disclose the detailed results of the analysis at this point...
No, that is confidential internal information and will be disclosed in the upcoming report by the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD). I can tell you this much: the analysis has shown that our portfolio is largely very resilient to climate risks.
Does this mean that Zurich will not make any adjustments to its portfolio, or will you be divesting yourself of individual properties?
As a major asset owner, manager, and insurer, we take a proactive approach to portfolio management in order to minimize risks and secure the long-term value of the portfolio. This means continuously identifying vulnerable properties, assessing them, and planning and implementing adaptation measures.
Do the adaptation measures include the sale of individual properties?
It cannot be ruled out that future adaptation measures may include the sale of individual properties. Climate risks are already taken into account in the purchase process.
English Translation. Originally published by Immobilien Business, December 11, 2025
